The scenery looks much more realistic to me, specially in what really concerns me like approaching at day or night in a crowded town, where you'll really find it difficult to find it - something impossible to happen in FSX. but it is IMO better than what I find in FSX (way better when talking about rotary wing and spaceships!!!). ![]() X-Plane's flight physics isn't perfect, nor the systems modelling including engines, etc. and it also had quite improved environment and weather). ![]() I look in the very first place for good/feasible flight and systems models (and you're all going to ask - why did this dude like MS FLIGHT then? Because it had great flight dynamics, really a big step forward from FSX, even if mixed with the arcadish feel of having cockpitless aircraft. Is X-Plane better than FSX? Is FSX better than X-Plane? No and No :-) Each has it's virtues and it's drawbacks. ![]() ![]() It was for me the best thing after MS FLIGHT on this return to simulation after having stopped for quite a while.įor someone having invested a lot in MSFS, I would recommend LM P3D, which I have tried last week after bying a 1 month license, although after finally having got acostumed to X-Plane10 flight and environment feel was difficult to accept as an alternative, or even a 2nd simulator (because I have difficulty using more than one at the same time - my problem, I know, but I am rather monogamic flightsimulation-wise.)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |